Feedback link

Appendix B: Resource classification

Development of new energy sources requires reliable estimates of how much energy is available at potential development sites. Reporting systems have been developed for the different resources types. Adherence to standards and common frameworks makes it possible for investors to evaluate risk and potential returns, and for governments to set policy and regulations and make decisions on infrastructure development.

Schemes currently commonly used for classifying minerals, petroleum and geothermal energy utilise two axes, one to describe geological certainty, and another to describe investment or commercial readiness. These schemes are based on the McKelvey classification published in 1972 and 1976. Each of the resource estimation and reporting schemes utilised in Australia for oil and gas, coal, thorium and uranium are discussed briefly below. A three-axis classification scheme, incorporating an economic and social viability axis, field project and feasibility axis, and geological knowledge axis, has been developed by United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNFC 2009) but is not applied in Australia currently.

Petroleum resource classification

The petroleum industry in Australia uses the Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS 2007) for classification of oil and gas resources. The description below is entirely a summary of the PRMS (2007) and an overview published by the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE 2007).

Oil and gas reserves and resources are defined as volumes that will be commercially recovered in the future. Unlike the inventory of a manufacturing company, reserves are physically located in reservoirs deep underground and cannot be visually inspected or counted, but rather are estimates based on the evaluation of data that provides evidence of the amount of oil and gas present. There is no definitive answer until the end of a reservoir's producing life. All reserve estimates involve some degree of uncertainty. The estimation of reserves volumes is generally performed by highly-skilled individuals who use their experience and professional judgment in the calculation of those volumes.

To take into account this uncertainty, the PRMS incorporates a central framework that categorises reserves and resources according to the level of certainty associated with their recoverable volumes (horizontal axis in the figure below), and classifies them according to the potential for reaching commercial producing status (vertical axis).

Differences in classes (vertical axis)

The four major recoverable resources classes defined by the PRMS are production, reserves, contingent resources, and prospective resources. There is also a distinct class for unrecoverable petroleum. These classes are shown on the vertical axis of the PRMS framework.

Production is the quantity of oil and natural gas that has been recovered already (by a specified date). This is primarily output from operations that has already been produced for use by consumers. Reserves represent that part of resources which are commercially recoverable and have been justified for development, while contingent and prospective resources are less certain because some significant commercial or technical hurdle must be overcome prior to there being confidence in the eventual production of the volumes.

Contingent resources are less certain than reserves. These are resources that are potentially recoverable but not yet considered mature enough for commercial development due to technological or business hurdles. For contingent resources to move into the reserves category, the key conditions, or contingencies, that prevented commercial development must be clarified and removed. As an example, all required internal and external approvals should be in place or determined to be forthcoming, including environmental and governmental approvals. There also must be evidence of firm intention by a company's management to proceed with development within a reasonable time frame (typically 5 years, though it could be longer).

Prospective resources are estimated volumes associated with undiscovered accumulations. These represent quantities of petroleum which are estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from oil and gas deposits identified on the basis of indirect evidence but which have not yet been drilled. This class represents a higher risk than contingent resources since the risk of discovery is also added. For prospective resources to become classified as contingent resources, hydrocarbons must be discovered, the accumulations must be further evaluated and an estimate of quantities that would be recoverable under appropriate development projects prepared.

Some petroleum will be classified as "unrecoverable" at this point in time, not being producible by any projects that the company may plan or foresee. While a portion of these quantities may become recoverable in the future as commercial circumstances change or technological developments occur, some of the remaining portion may never be recovered due to physical or chemical constraints in the reservoir. The volumes classified using the system represent the analysis of the day, and should be regularly reviewed and updated, as necessary, to reflect changing conditions.

A project may have recoverable quantities in several resource classes simultaneously. As barriers to development are removed, some resources may move to a higher classification. One of the primary distinctions between resources and reserves is that while resources are technically recoverable, they may not be commercially viable. Reserves are always commercially viable and there is intent development them.

Differences in categories (horizontal axis)

Within any resource class other than production, volumes are placed into different categories based on their certainty of eventually coming out of the ground. Decisions to upgrade volumes to any category within a class are generally based on the technical certainty of recovering the volumes. In this discussion, the focus is on the reserve class, as these volumes are commonly the focus of public discussions of oil and gas company producing assets.

The highest valued category of reserves is "proved" reserves. Proved reserves have a reasonable certainty of being recovered, which means a high degree of confidence that the volumes will be recovered. To be clear, reserves must have all commercial aspects addressed. It is technical issues which separate proved from unproved categories.

"Probable" or "possible" reserves are lower categories of reserves, commonly combined and referred to as "unproved reserves," with decreasing levels of technical certainty. Probable reserves are volumes that are defined as "less likely to be recovered than proved, but more certain to be recovered than Possible Reserves". Possible reserves are reserves which analysis of geological and engineering data suggests are less likely to be recoverable than probable reserves.

Figure C1 Graphical representation of the SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE resources classification system. The system defines the major recoverable resources classes: Production, Reserves, Contingent Resources, and Prospective Resources, as well as Unrecoverable petroleum (PRMS 2007) The "Range of Uncertainty" reflects a range of estimated quantities potentially recoverable from an accumulation by a project, while the vertical axis represents the "Chance of Commerciality", that is, the chance that the project that will be developed and reach commercial producing status.

The term 1P is frequently used to denote proved reserves, 2P is the sum of proved and probable reserves and 3P the sum of proved, probable and possible reserves. The best estimate of recovery from committed projects is generally considered to be the 2P sum of proved and probable reserves. Note that these volumes only refer to projects that are currently justified for or already in development. Total value of any resource base must include an assessment of the contingent and prospective resources as well as reserves.

In order for volumes to move from one category to the next, the technical issues which cause them to be placed in less certain categories must be resolved. In the majority of cases, this requires that additional data must be obtained before any greater certainty can be recognised. This may include, among other things, the drilling of additional wells, the monitoring of current production to better understand performance or the implementation of a pilot to have greater confidence in the volumes that full scale development projects may eventually produce.

Mineral resource classification

Minerals companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange report resource information according to the JORC Code (2012). The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the 'JORC Code' or 'the Code') sets out minimum standards, recommendations and guidelines for Public Reporting in Australasia of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. The Joint Ore Reserves Committee ('JORC') was established in 1971 and published several reports containing recommendations on the classification and Public Reporting of Ore Reserves prior to the release of the first edition of the JORC Code in 1989. Similar to the McKelvey (1976) classification, The JORC Code utilises axes of geological uncertainty and commercial readiness. The summary below paraphrases the JORC Code (2012).

Figure C3.1 Summary of the JORC 2012 Code. Arrows Indicate the general pathway of classification of a mineral occurrence as work Increases, from Exploration Results in very early stages of discovery, through to Mineral Resources as more geological certainty is gained, into Ore Reserves as Modifying Factors are determined (JORC 2012).

A 'Mineral Resource' is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade (or quality), and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade (or quality), continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories.

All reports of Mineral Resources must satisfy the requirement that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction (ie more likely than not), regardless of the classification of the resource.

An 'Inferred Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade (or quality) are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade (or quality) continuity. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to an Ore Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.

An 'Indicated Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade (or quality), densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Ore Reserve.

A 'Measured Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade (or quality), densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral Resource. It may be converted to a Proved Ore Reserve or under certain circumstances to a Probable Ore Reserve.

'Modifying Factors' are considerations used to convert Mineral Resources to Ore Reserves. These include, but are not restricted to, mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors. Consideration of the confidence level of the Modifying Factors is important in conversion of Mineral Resources to Ore Reserves.

An 'Ore Reserve' is the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility level as appropriate that include application of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified.

A 'Probable Ore Reserve' is the economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource. The confidence in the Modifying Factors applying to a Probable Ore Reserve is lower than that applying to a Proved Ore Reserve. A Probable Ore Reserve has a lower level of confidence than a Proved Ore Reserve but is of sufficient quality to serve as the basis for a decision on the development of the deposit.

A 'Proved Ore Reserve' is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource. A Proved Ore Reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the Modifying Factors.

Uranium resource classification

Geoscience Australia prepares estimates of Australia's uranium resources within categories defined by the OECD/NEA (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency) and the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (OECD 2014). The following is summarised from that publication.

Uranium resources are classified by a scheme (based on geological certainty and costs of production) developed to combine resource estimates from a number of different countries into harmonised global figures. Identified resources (which include Reasonably Assured Resources (RAR), and Inferred Resources (IR)) refer to uranium deposits delineated by sufficient direct measurement to conduct pre-feasibility and sometimes feasibility studies. For RAR, high confidence in estimates of grade and tonnage are generally compatible with mining decision-making standards. Inferred resources are not defined with such a high degree of confidence and generally require further direct measurement prior to making a decision to mine. Undiscovered resources (prognosticated and speculative) refer to resources that are expected to exist based on geological knowledge of previously discovered deposits and regional geological mapping.

Resource estimates are divided into separate categories reflecting different levels of confidence in the quantities reported. The resources are further separated into categories based on the cost of production.

Reasonably assured resources (RAR) refers to uranium that occurs in known mineral deposits of delineated size, grade and configuration such that the quantities which could be recovered within the given production cost ranges with currently proven mining and processing technology, can be specified. Estimates of tonnage and grade are based on specific sample data and measurements of the deposits and on knowledge of deposit characteristics. Reasonably assured resources have a high assurance of existence. Unless otherwise noted, RAR are expressed in terms of quantities of uranium recoverable from mineable ore (see recoverable resources).

Inferred resources refers to uranium, in addition to RAR, that is inferred to occur based on direct geological evidence, in extensions of well-explored deposits, or in deposits in which geological continuity has been established but where specific data, including measurements of the deposits, and knowledge of the deposit's characteristics, are considered to be inadequate to classify the resource as RAR. Estimates of tonnage, grade and cost of further delineation and recovery are based on such sampling as is available and on knowledge of the deposit characteristics as determined in the best known parts of the deposit or in similar deposits. Less reliance can be placed on the estimates in this category than on those for RAR. Unless otherwise noted, inferred resources are expressed in terms of quantities of uranium recoverable from mineable ore.

Cost categories

The OECD (2014) uses cost categories, in United States dollars (USD), defined as: <USD 40/kgU, <USD 80/kgU, <USD 130/kgU and <USD 260/kgU. All resource categories are defined in terms of costs of uranium recovered at the ore processing plant.

RAR and IR estimates are expressed in terms of recoverable tonnes of uranium, i.e. quantities of uranium recoverable from mineable ore, as opposed to quantities contained in mineable ore, or quantities in situ, i.e. not taking into account mining and milling losses.