AusGeo News  December 2009  Issue No. 96

Expanding our knowledge of North Queensland

Paul Henson, Russell Korsch (Geoscience Australia), Ian Withnall, Laurie Hutton (Geological Survey of Queensland), Bob Henderson (James Cook University) and the North Queensland Project Team*

Insights into the energy and resource potential from new seismic and complementary data

Figure 1. Map of North Queensland showing geological provinces, basins and seismic traverses that form the 2007 Isa-Georgetown-Charters Towers seismic survey. The map also shows the locations of previous seismic surveys acquired in 1994 and 2006.

North Queensland is one of the most richly mineralised regions of Australia, both in terms of total resources, and the variety of commodities and deposit types. To better understand regional geological controls on these resources, especially energy resources, Geoscience Australia, in collaboration with the Geological Survey of Queensland and AuScope, undertook a deep crustal seismic survey in this region in 2007. The survey was conducted under the auspices of Geoscience Australia's Onshore Energy Security Program and the Queensland Government's Smart Mining and Smart Exploration initiatives. AusScope was established under the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy to characterise the structure and evolution of the Australian continent. This article highlights the most significant results of this survey and complementary research and syntheses, as well as providing links to more detailed reports.

Figure 1.Map of North Queensland showing geological provinces, basins and seismic traverses that form the 2007 Isa–Georgetown–Charters Towers seismic survey. The map also shows the locations of previous seismic surveys acquired in 1994 and 2006.

Geological background and data acquisition

North Queensland (figure 1) consists of three geological elements:

Proterozoic basement rocks, particularly in the Mount Isa Province, contain world class sediment-hosted zinc-lead and iron oxide-copper-gold resources as well as significant, though largely unexploited, uranium resources. The Tasman Orogen in North Queensland hosts a variety of granite-related commodities, including gold-copper and tin-tungsten as well as lode gold and volcanic-hosted massive sulphide zinc-lead-copper deposits. The basins contain major phosphate deposits and have potential for uranium and possibly geothermal energy.

Figure 2. Images of traverse 07GA-IG1 showing (from top to bottom) interpreted seismic section, uniterpreted, migrated seismic section, and electrical resistivity from 2D inversions of magnetotelluric data.

In mid 2007, 1381 kilometres of 2D seismic reflection data were acquired along four traverses (07GA-IG1, 07GA-IG2, 07GA-GC1 and 07GA-A1: figure 1), with magnetotelluric data collected along the first three traverses. Nakamura et al (2009) provide the technical details of the data acquisition and processing, and the seismic and magnetotelluric data from these traverses can be downloaded through the Geoscience Australia website. Additional data acquisition was undertaken by Geoscience Australia and the Geological Survey of Queensland to assist with interpretation of the seismic data, and to better understand the geological and tectonic history of North Queensland. This included targeted geochronology and geochemistry, as well as new gravity acquisition along the seismic survey traverses. 3D inversion modelling of the geophysical data was also undertaken.

Figure 2. Images of traverse 07GA-IG1 showing (from top to bottom) interpreted seismic section, uninterpreted, migrated seismic section, and electrical resistivity from 2D inversions of magnetotelluric data.

Major results of the seismic survey

The results of the seismic survey, including exploration implications were presented at a workshop as part of the North Queensland Exploration and Mining Conference in May 2009 (Camuti and Young 2009). Presentations can be downloaded through the Geoscience Australia website. The following major features have been recognised in the seismic data:

Tectonic history of North Queensland

Based on the new seismic interpretation, with support from existing and new geochronological and geochemical data, 3D inversion of geophysical data (Chopping and Henson 2009), and geological synthesis (Kositcin et al 2009), the authors have proposed a new, possibly controversial tectonic model (figure 3) for the evolution of North Queensland (see Camuti and Young 2009 and Chopping and Henson 2009):

Figure 3. Preliminary model for the tectonic evolution of North Queensland: a) alternative evolutions prior to 1710 Ma; b) evolution after 1710 ma.

Figure 3. Preliminary model for the tectonic evolution of North Queensland: a) alternative evolutions prior to 1710 Ma; b) evolution after 1710 ma.

Metallogenic significance of seismic results

Some of the features identified in the seismic survey are also inferred to have metallogenic significance. The most significant include:

3D maps and geophysical modelling

Figure 4. Images showing a) magnetic and b) gravity inversions along the eastern margin of the Mount Isa Province. The top image shows a subset of the 3D magnetic inversion along the eastern margin of the Mount Isa Province. The predicted magnetic susceptibilities are draped on the 07GA-IG1 seismic line with the seismic interpretation. An isosurface contains all cells with magnetic susceptibilities ≥ 75 x 10-3 SI. The bottom image shows a similar subset of the 3D gravity inversion, with predicted magnetic predicted densities ≥  2.78 grams/cubic centimetre enclosed by an isosurface.

To help define the 3D architecture of the study area, inversions of gravity and magnetic data were generated. Inversions produce 3D models of density and magnetic susceptibility variations in the subsurface that allow prediction of the geometry and type of buried rocks (figure 4). The only geological constraints used in the inversion models were basic 3D province definitions derived from seismic data. A striking feature in the gravity inversion results is a sublinear belt of high-density material extending roughly north-south through Ernest Henry, then heading south-southeast and passing just to the west of Duchess. This trend may represent a major corridor in the Mount Isa Province. The entire Mount Isa Province itself is characterised by high-magnetic susceptibility.

Figure 4. Images showing gravity and magnetic inversions along the eastern margin of the Mount Isa Province. The top image shows a subset of the 3D magnetic inversion along the eastern margin of the Mount Isa Province. The predicted magnetic susceptibilities are draped on the 07GA-IG1 seismic line with the seismic interpretation. An isosurface contains all cells with magnetic susceptibilities ≥ 75 x 10-3 SI. The bottom image shows a similar subset of the 3D gravity inversion, with predicted densities ≥ 2.78 grams/cubic centimetre enclosed by an isosurface.

The eastern boundary of the Mount Isa Province, imaged on traverse 07GA-IG1 as a west-dipping series of reflections, is clearly imaged as a strong west-dipping boundary in both the gravity and magnetic inversions. The inversions track the boundary away from the seismic line, particularly to the north. To the south the location is uncertain, although extension along a major gradient mapped in gravity data is favoured. They also image the Ernest Henry iron oxide-copper-gold deposit as being associated with a small dome of high-magnetic susceptibility material extending from depth.

The inversion results confirm the presence of the Millungera Basin as a relatively low density and low-magnetic susceptibility feature extending away from traverse 07GA-IG1. In addition, the inversions predict the physical properties of four possible granitic bodies interpreted from seismic data beneath the Millungera Basin. The westernmost and easternmost of these possible granites have the lowest predicted density, consistent with a more felsic composition that would favour concentration of heat producing elements. As the easternmost granite is also under the thickest sedimentary pile, it perhaps represents a more favourable target in terms of geothermal potential.

North Queensland geodynamic and mineral system synthesis

Over the last year, Geoscience Australia's Onshore Energy Geodynamic Framework Project has undertaken a geodynamic synthesis of North Queensland, from the Paleoproterozoic to Recent (Kositcin et al 2009), to:

Geological data were synthesised on a regional, largely orogenic, basis to identify geological events and geodynamic cycles. The synthesis involved the compilation of available published (and unpublished) state geological survey data and data in the scientific literature. All data were captured in Geoscience Australia's internal PROVINCES and EVENTS databases and used to produce digital time-space-event plots for each region within North Queensland, which allowed comparison between regions and the identification of major geological events and geodynamic cycles.

To better understand the geodynamic setting of, and spatial relationships between known mineral deposits, a synthesis of significant mineral deposits in North Queensland was produced to help delineate possible extensions of mineralised belts based on our geodynamic interpretation. The team also used the geodynamic synthesis to predict areas of mineral potential outside known mineralised districts or provinces. Prediction of mineral prospectivity conducted at the North Queensland scale provides a first-order guide to area selection for mineral exploration (Kositcin et al 2009).

Energy potential

Data generated during this project as well as existing data summarised in the synthesis (Kositcin et al 2009) were used to assess the potential of North Queensland for uranium and geothermal energy resources (Huston 2009). This assessment has highlighted a number of targets which are considered to have potential.

The energy assessment confirmed potential for uranium-bearing iron oxide-copper-gold deposits to the north of the Cloncurry district, highlighting zones of hematite and sulphide alteration (Chopping and Henson 2009) as potential targets. Moreover, the broad decrease in metamorphic grade from south to north in the Isa Province suggests that the northern parts of the province may have greater potential for uranium-rich systems as these appear to be high level systems (Skirrow et al 2007), which would be more likely to be preserved in lower grade rocks.

The energy assessment also highlighted potential for metasomatic uranium deposits such as the Valhalla deposit, along the margins of the Leichhardt River Fault Trough, particularly where it is juxtaposed against uranium-rich granites, for example those of the Sybella suite. Potential for sandstone-hosted uranium deposits is inferred along the western margin of the Eromanga Basin, where it onlaps onto Proterozoic basement enriched in uranium (Huston 2009).

In addition to highlighting potential for uranium mineralisation, data being generated as part of this project is being used to better understand the geothermal potential of the Milungera Basin. This basin, which appears on the 07GA-IG1 seismic line and on the eastern ends of the 2006 Mount Isa seismic traverses (06GA-M4 and 06GA-M5), is coincident with several negative anomalies in the Bouguer anomaly map. These anomalies have been interpreted as granites which could contain high concentrations of radioactive (heat-producing) elements. The seismic interpretations have been used to define the distribution of Millungera Basin sediments. Using this interpretation together with 3D gravity inversion modelling of rocks beneath the basin, six granite bodies have been defined within basement directly beneath the basin. Forward thermal modelling is currently being performed on the results of the inversions to identify possible scenarios for the subsurface temperature distribution and ascertain the potential for a geothermal resource.

Conclusions

Interpretation of deep crustal seismic data, combined with geophysical inversion modelling, geological and metallogenic synthesis, energy potential assessment and geothermal modelling, have identified fundamental new crustal boundaries and provinces in North Queensland, providing important constraints on the geodynamic history of the area, and pointing to areas of previously unknown potential for iron oxide-copper-gold, lode gold, uranium and geothermal energy potential. Some results (including seismic data and interpretations) are online and can be accessed through the references or through the Onshore Energy Geodynamic Framework web page. Explorers are encouraged to use the data in this report and related documents to develop and test models for the tectonic and metallogenic evolution of North Queensland and to develop new concepts for targeting mineral resources.

Acknowledgements

This paper is a product of the North Queensland Project Team, and we thank the following members of the team for their contributions: Bridget Ayling, Terry Brennan, Martyn Hazelwood, Leonie Jones, Lex Lambeck, Bridgette Lewis, Tony Meixner, Terry Mernagh, Peter Milligan, Narelle Neumann, Malcolm Nicoll, Indrajit Roy, Erdinç Saygin, Anthony Schofield, Simon van der Wielen (Geoscience Australia), Tom Blenkinsop, Bill Collins, Richard Wormald (James Cook University), Chris Fergusson (University of Wollongong), Marnie Forster and Gordon Lister (ANU). Dean Hoatson and Leonie Jones provided comments that improved the final version of this article.

*Contributors to this article include: Nick Williams, Natalie Kositcin, Alison Kirkby, David Champion, David Huston, Richard Chopping, Richard Blewett, Aki Nakamura, Josef Holzschuh, Ross Costelloe and Roger Skirrow (Geoscience Australia).

For more information phone Paul Henson on +61 2 6249 9138 (email paul.henson@ga.gov.au) or phone David Huston on+61 2 6249 9577 (email david.huston@ga.gov.au)


References

  1. Betts PG. 1999. Palaeoproterozoic mid-basin inversion in the northern Mt Isa terrane, Queensland.Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 40:735–748.
  2. Camuti K & Young D (eds). 2009. Northern Queensland Exploration and Mining 2009 and North Queensland seismic and MT workshop. Australian Institute of Geoscientists Bulletin 49.
  3. Chopping R & Henson PA. 2009. 3D map and supporting geophysical studies in the North Queensland region. Geoscience Australia Record 2009/29.
  4. Goleby BR et al. 2004. Deep seismic reflection profiling in the Archean northeastern Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia: implications for crustal architecture and mineral potential. Tectonophysics 388:119–133.
  5. Huston DL (ed). In press. An assessment of the energy, mineral and geothermal potential of North Queensland. Geoscience Australia Record.
  6. Kositcin N et al. 2009. Geodynamic synthesis of the North Queensland region and implications for metallogeny. Geoscience Australia Record 2009/30. Available at: www.ga.gov.au/products/servlet/
  7. Lyons P & Goleby BR. 2005. The 2003 Gawler Craton Seismic Survey: notes from the Seismic Workshop held at Gawler Craton State of Play 2004. Geoscience Australia Record 2005/19. Available at: www.ga.gov.au/products/servlet/
  8. Nakamura A et al. In press. Mt Isa–Georgetown–Charters Towers deep crustal seismic reflection survey 2007 (L184, L185 and L 186). Geoscience Australian Record.
  9. Skirrow RG et al. 2007. Timing of iron oxide Cu-Au-(u) hydrothermal activity and Nd isotope constraints on metal sources in the Gawler Craton, South Australia. Economic Geology 102:1441–1470.

Related articles/websites

Onshore Energy Geodynamic Framework Project

Unless otherwise noted, all Geoscience Australia material on this website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence.